_______________________ |
Over at 538, Tom Schaller asks Perot transformation consultant Ron Rapoport of William Mary to review the tea partiers of 2010 with the Perotistas of the 1990s:
The Perot transformation is innately different. It was shaped around a claimant during a presidential choosing campaign. This explains the await by Perot supporters for a third celebration that tea partiers at benefaction lack. The vital disproportion is that Perot transformation was a sum rejecting of both parties, whilst the tea celebration transformation is a sum rejecting of customarily one party--the Democrats.
Whereas customarily 5% of tea celebration supporters pronounced that they customarily or regularly voted Democratic, entirely one-thrid of Perot supporters had voted for Walter Mondale in 1984 and somewhat some-more had voted for Michael Dukakis in 1988.
In the New York Times survey, 54% of tea partiers rated the Republican Party favorably. Only 17% of Perot callers rated possibly celebration as above average or outstanding and 43% rated both parties as below average, or poor with 8% rating the Republicans as above average or outstanding, and 9% rating the Democrats as outstanding or above average. Sixty-nine percent rated the Republicans as below average or poor, with 64% observant the same about Democrats.
The...
Click here to review the complete article...
_______________________ |
0 comments:
Post a Comment